Moyer apologizes, Snoddon resigns while Directors dither
Ian Kaufman
News Writer

VP Finance candidate Brent Moyer (left) addresses LU Radio host Josh Kolic’s questions at last Friday’s LUSU Board of Directors meeting. Photo by Nik Broukhanski.
Just as LUSU’s Board of Directors was getting set to wind down the year, an issue they thought they’d resolved in January came back to bite them in their collective posteriors. While other students partook of a Latin American-themed party down the hall at the Study, the Board and a dozen or so students entertained themselves instead with reprisals and recriminations over LUSU’s increasingly labyrinthine trail of election errors. By the end of the night, one director had resigned and students were left facing a possible by-election.
The question that came back to haunt the board was the eligibility of VP Finance-elect Ian Dasti. Last week his erstwhile opponent, Brent Moyer, sent the Argus and LU Radio a letter (in an email he tried to pass off as “anonymous”) from the Student Union’s lawyer. Dated January 22, 2009, the letter advised the Board that Dasti should not be considered eligible to run in the elections. Not enrolled in any courses in the winter semester, he was paying no LUSU fees and hence was not a member of the Student Union.
How Moyer, who is not a Board member, got hold of this letter is a mystery. He claims he received it anonymously, although he did say that Director Thomas Valiquette “brought the issue to light” in an MSN conversation.
While apologizing for the deceptive way in which he made it public, he said that “this letter should not have been kept secret from the membership […] to go against the advice of your own lawyer was wrong and that had to come to light.”
The day after receiving the letter, the Board followed its advice and disqualified Dasti. However – and this is where it gets labyrinthine - they reversed their decision the next week, based on Dasti’s arguments that he was still technically registered in his program at the University.
Moyer’s email in itself would not have hampered Dasti’s ratification. However, another error was brought to the Board’s attention: their failure to follow the proper procedural rules in reinstating Dasti as a candidate.
In overturning their previous decision to bar him from running, the Board would have needed a two-thirds majority, which they failed to achieve. The error went unnoticed, and Dasti went on to defeat Moyer by a margin of 25 votes.
As a result of all of this, the Board must now decide whether to ratify Dasti despite the errors or to declare his election null and void. In that case, either Moyer would be acclaimed in his place, or a by-election would be held. The Board will hold a meeting as soon as their lawyer is able to attend.
Most students present expressed their frustration that the decision on Dasti’s status was put off. Engineering Student Society President, Zac Trolley, stated that he represented 12% of the student body in asking the Board to resolve the matter as soon as possible.
Granville, however, was not convinced that the handful of people present represented a significant swathe of student opinion. Rather, he suggested, “there are two groups here that are partisan.”
That the debate was being driven by personal grudges or friendships with Dasti and Moyer was a sentiment echoed by others, as well.
“This isn’t a matter of names or agendas,” chided one student. “This is a matter of rules which the Board of Directors needs to govern by.”
Others, however, were simply fed up with LUSU’s “inability to act,” as former Director, Mike Snoddon, put it in his letter of resignation.
VPSI-elect Trevor Cava also pressed the Board to resolve the issue rather than wait another week, at the least. Their frustration with yet another delay might be understandable, but Granville, General Manager Pat Callaghan and Josh Kolic of LU Radio expressed caution, hinting at the possibility of legal action from some of the parties involved should they take an incorrect decision.
Details on the time and location of the meeting will be posted at www.theargus.ca as soon as they are available.
Clusterf**k to the LUSU office
January 22 CRO Andrew Follis, LUSU Executives, and BOD members receive a letter from LUSU lawyer, Anthony Carfagnini, recommending that Ian Dasti be disallowed to run in the LUSU executive election.
January 23 During an in-camera session, the Board rules that Dasti is not classified as a LU student and is therefore ineligible to run for VP Finance.
January 30 Dasti challenges the Board’s decision to disqualify him from the LUSU elections and demands to be reinstated as a candidate. A motion to reconsider the Board’s earlier decision is supported by a majority of voting Board members, but does not achieve the two-thirds majority of votes needed to overturn the previous week’s ruling. The mistake goes unnoticed and Dasti is reinstated as a candidate in the election.
March 14 Following a recount of the votes for VP Finance, Dasti is declared the unofficial election winner of the LUSU Executive elections over Brent Moyer by 24 votes.
March 20 The Argus and CILU Radio receive the Carfagnini Law Office letter from an anonymous e-mail account.
March 22 Moyer concedes that he was responsible for mailing the Carfagnani letter to the Argus and CILU Radio despite previous denials.
March 27 Board decides to reopen the question of Dasti’s eligibility, but defer decision so legal counsel and student input can be sought.
April ? Board meeting will be held to decide amongst the options of ratifying Dasti, holding a by-election, or acclaiming Moyer.